Skip to main content

11 charged for selling Samsungs bendable display technology to Chinese rivals

Prosecutors in South Korea have charged 11 people for illegally selling Samsung’s bendable screen technology to a Chinese rival company. According to Bloomberg, the CEO of Samsung supplier Toptec, and eight of his employees had received 15.5 billion won (approx $13.8 million) for conspiring and transferring information regarding organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays. Samsung uses OLED panels in its phones, televisions and monitors. The two others were from the Chinese company with whom they hatched the conspiracy. Bloomberg says that intellectual property theft is a national concern for South Korea and the country is spending billions for becoming self-sustaining in areas such as memory chips and displays, two fields where Samsung is the world leader. On the revelation, Samsung Display said it was “shocked at the results of the investigation by prosecutors, at a time when competitors are intensifying their technological rivalry.” Samsung said that it would keep a close eye on the trial. Citing prosecutors, the report noted that the South Korean supplier transferred “3D lamination” technology and other equipment to the Chinese screen maker between May and August, violating a non-disclosure agreement with Samsung. They were caught while loading additional pieces onto a ship headed for the mainland. Another report says that Samsung’s display technology is considered a “national core technology” under South Korean law, making the offense graver. What’s more, one of the accused was said to be using a fake company headed by his sister-in-law to cover up the espionage. Reportedly, Samsung spent about 150 billion won over a period of six years to develop the OLED technology. Meanwhile, Toptec has issued a statement denying the charges. “Our company has never provided Samsung Display’s industrial technology or business secrets to a Chinese client. Our company will fully cooperate with legal proceedings to find the truth in court,” the company was quoted as saying. This is not the first time that such an incident has occured in the technology world. Earlier this year, Anthony Levandowski, a former Google employee and the engineer behind the company's self-driving car programme was fired from Uber after he was accussed of stealing autonomous car technology from Waymo (a subsidiary of Google's parent Alphabet) before joining Uber. Levandowski reportedly downloaded around 14,000 files from his company-issued computer containing trade secrets related to Waymo's LIDAR technology, circuit board designs, and testing documentation.

from Latest Technology News https://ift.tt/2Rpv7Vk

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What if a botched Google search card says you are a serial killer

Many of us have come to heavily rely on Google Search and often don’t question the veracity of information Google cherry-picks from the vast data available on the world wide web for its search cards. This incident, which is one part funny and two parts scary, makes it clear that Google’s Knowlege Graph may not be as sacrosanct as you may have believed.  Hristo Georgiev was informed by a former colleague that a Google search of his name returned a Google Knowlege Graph that depicted his photo and linked it to a Bulgarian rapist and serial killer of the same name, also known as ‘The Sadist’, who murdered five people back in the 1970s and was later executed by shooting.  The graph linked the info to a Wikipedia article, which incidentally had no link to any of Georgiev’s profile or his image. It was Google’s algorithms that erroneously matched the two. What’s even more problematic is that Hristo Georgiev is not a unique name and is shared by hundreds of other people.  As...

MWC 2023: A comparison of the top 4 Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 13 Pro features

Xiaomi launched the Xiaomi 13 and Xiaomi 13 Pro globally a day before MWC 2023. And if you are planning to buy a new Xiaomi flagship phone, you may need clarity on the Xiaomi 13 and Xiaomi 13 Pro differences. The latter is the bigger, better, and pricier model of the two.  So, what we will be doing here is comparing the specs, features and price of these two phones and finding out which one better fits your bill. Xiaomi 13 vs Xiaomi 13 Pro comparison These differences between Xiaomi 13 and Xiaomi 13 Pro might affect your buying decision. We will be comparing the two Xiaomi phones based on their design, display, performance factors, battery, camera, and price. 1. Design Xiaomi 13 Pro is slightly thicker and heavier than Xiaomi 13. It comes with Gorilla Glass Victus protection on the front and a ceramic back option. 2. Display Xiaomi 13 Pro has got a curvy-edged display whilst the regular 13 has a flat front panel. The Pro model has an LTPO screen which means an adaptive refres...